Using Shared Decision Making to Help Patients Decide on Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment Webcast 037IC (2019)
Shared Decision Making was recently accepted as the standard of care when counseling patients considering PSA screening by the US Preventative Services Taskforce. Shared Decision Making is also embedded into numerous recently published AUA guidelines (including the localized prostate cancer guideline). In spite of these clear recommendations, Shared Decision Making is not frequently used in clinical practice.
We propose a course that would teach the essentials of Shared Decision Making (SDM) to practicing urologists who help patients decide about prostate cancer screening and treatment. The course will go over the latest research documenting the benefits and drawbacks of Shared Decision Making when counseling patients considering PSA screening as well as treatment approaches for incident localized prostate cancer. It will also teach the participants how to practice SDM with their patients and will engage them in group-based role play. At the end of the session, participants will understand how to apply SDM in their practice.
Support provided by independent educational grants from:
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Genomic Health
- Pfizer, Inc.
- Sanofi Genzyme
- Advanced Practice Provider (Nurse Practitioners & Physician Assistants)
After completing this activity, participants will be able to:
- Explain Shared Decision Making.
- Discuss the impact of shared decision making on patients and on patient-clinician communication.
- Describe at least one implementation strategy for using shared decision making in clinical practice.
- Apply Shared Decision Making techniques into their routine practice counseling patients.
Education Council Disclosures
AUA Office of Education Staff has nothing to disclose.
METHOD OF PARTICIPATION:
Learners will participate in this online educational activity by taking the pretest, viewing the webcast and completing the posttest and evaluation. To claim CME credit for this enduring material, learners must complete the posttest, passing with 80% accuracy and submit the program evaluation.
Estimated time to complete this activity: 2.00 hours
Release Date: May, 2019
Expiration Date: May, 2020
The American Urological Association (AUA) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The American Urological Association designates this enduring activity for a maximum of 2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
The AUA is not accredited to offer credit to participants who are not MDs or DOs. However, the AUA will issue documentation of participation that states that the activity was certified for AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™.
EVIDENCE BASED CONTENT:
It is the policy of the AUA to ensure that the content contained in this CME activity is valid, fair, balanced, scientifically rigorous, and free of commercial bias.
AUA DISCLOSURE POLICY:
All persons in a position to control the content of an educational activity (i.e., activity planners, presenters, authors) are required to disclose to the provider any relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The AUA must determine if the individual’s relationships may influence the educational content and resolve any conflicts of interest prior to the commencement of the educational activity. The intent of this disclosure is not to prevent individuals with relevant financial relationships from participating, but rather to provide learners information with which they can make their own judgments.
RESOLUTION OF IDENTIFIED CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
All disclosures will be reviewed by the program/course directors or editors for identification of conflicts of interest. Peer reviewers, working with the program directors and/or editors, will document the mechanism(s) for management and resolution of the conflict of interest and final approval of the activity will be documented prior to implementation. Any of the mechanisms below can/will be used to resolve conflict of interest:
- Peer review for valid, evidence-based content of all materials associated with an educational activity by the course/program director, editor, and/or Education Content Review Committee or its subgroup.
- Limit content to evidence with no recommendations
- Introduction of a debate format with an unbiased moderator (point-counterpoint)
- Inclusion of moderated panel discussion
- Publication of a parallel or rebuttal article for an article that is felt to be biased
- Limit equipment representatives to providing logistics and operation support only in procedural demonstrations
- Divestiture of the relationship by faculty
OFF-LABEL OR UNAPPROVED USE OF DRUGS OR DEVICES:
The audience is advised that this continuing medical education activity may contain reference(s) to off-label or unapproved uses of drugs or devices. Please consult the prescribing information for full disclosure of approved uses.
- 2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™
- 2.00 Non-Physician Participation