Prostate Cancer Update Webcast 063IC (2018)
This course will offer a review of what faculty believe are the most important articles in the English-speaking literature on prostate cancer from May 2017 to April 2018. Focus will be placed on articles that have relevance to clinical practice, including both research and clinical articles.
This educational series is supported by independent educational grants from:
- Genomic Health
- Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
- Medivation, Inc. a Pfizer company
- Sanofi Genzyme.
- Advanced Practice Provider (Nurse Practitioners & Physician Assistants)
After completing this activity, participants will be able to:
- Cite important new publications in this field during the past year
- Identify the relative strengths and weaknesses of the reports
- Appraise how new studies relate to the existing state-of-the-art in clinical practice
- Analyze whether they and their colleagues should consider changing their practice based on the new information
William Catalona, MD: Beckman Coulter Incorporated: Consultant or Advisor, Meeting Participant or Lecturer, Scientific Study or Trial; deCODE genetics: Consultant or Advisor, Meeting Participant or Lecturer, Scientific Study or Trial; Nanosphere: Consultant or Advisor; OHMX: Consultant or Advisor, Scientific Study or Trial, Owner, Product Development
Douglas Dahl, MD, FACS: Amgen, Pfizer, C.R. Bard, Abbott, Johnson and Johnson, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Eli Lilly, ExpressScripts, Mylan, Bristol Myers Squibb: Investment Interest
Stanley Liauw, MD: Nothing to disclose
Stacy Loeb, MD, MSc: Lilly: Consultant or Advisor; Sanofi: Other; GE: Consultant or Advisor
Robert Nadler, MD: Allena: Scientific Study or Trial
Russell Szmulewitz, MD: Pfizer: Consultant or Advisor; Genentech: Scientific Study or Trial; Exelixis: Consultant or Advisor; Abbvie: Scientific Study or Trial; Incyte: Scientific Study or Trial; Astellas: Scientific Study or Trial; Merck: Meeting Participant or Lecturer, Consultant or Advisor; Janssen: Consultant or Advisor; Amgen: Consultant or Advisor
Method of Participation
To claim CME credit/hours of participation, the learner must view the webcast, complete the post-test passing with 80% accuracy and submit the activity evaluation.
Estimated time to complete this activity: 2.00 hour
Release Date: June, 2018
Expiration Date: June, 2019
Accreditation: The American Urological Association (AUA) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
AMA Credit Designation: The American Urological Association designates this enduring material for a maximum of 2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Other Learners: The AUA is not accredited to offer credit to participants who are not MDs or DOs. However, the AUA will issue documentation of participation that states that the activity was certified for AMA PRA Category 1.00 Credit™.
Evidence Based Content: It is the policy of the AUA to ensure that the content contained in this CME activity is valid, fair, balanced, scientifically rigorous, and free of commercial bias.
AUA Disclosure Policy: All persons in a position to control the content of an educational activity (i.e., activity planners, presenters, authors) provided by the AUA are required to disclose to the provider any relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest. The AUA must determine if the individual’s relationships may influence the educational content and resolve any conflicts of interest prior to the commencement of the educational activity. The intent of this disclosure is not to prevent individuals with relevant financial relationships from participating, but rather to provide learners information with which they can make their own judgments.
Resolution of Identified Conflict of Interest: All disclosures will be reviewed by the program/course directors or editors for identification of conflicts of interest. Peer reviewers, working with the program directors and/or editors, will document the mechanism(s) for management and resolution of the conflict of interest and final approval of the activity will be documented prior to implementation. Any of the mechanisms below can/will be used to resolve conflict of interest:
- Peer review for valid, evidence-based content of all materials associated with an educational activity by the course/program director, editor, and/or Education Content Review Committee or its subgroup.
- Limit content to evidence with no recommendations
- Introduction of a debate format with an unbiased moderator (point-counterpoint)
- Inclusion of moderated panel discussion
- Publication of a parallel or rebuttal article for an article that is felt to be biased
- Limit equipment representatives to providing logistics and operation support only in procedural demonstrations
- Divestiture of the relationship by faculty
Disclaimer: The opinions and recommendations expressed by faculty, authors and other experts whose input is included in this program are their own and do not necessarily represent the viewpoint of the AUA.
Acknowledgements: Support provided by an independent education grant from AbbVie, Astellas, Genomic Health, Janssen Biotech, Inc., administered by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Medivation, Inc. a Pfizer company and Sanofi Genzyme.
Reproduction Permission: Reproduction of written materials developed for this AUA course is prohibited without the written permission from individual authors and the American Urological Association.
- 2.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™
- 2.00 Non-Physician Participation